Year: 2018

Women says her Amazon Echo recorded her conversation and then sent it to one of her contacts

[KIRO Channel 7]: A Portland family contacted Amazon to investigate after they say a private conversation in their home was recorded by Amazon's Alexa -- the voice-controlled smart speaker -- and that the recorded audio was sent to the phone of a random person in Seattle, who was in the family’s contact list.

"My husband and I would joke and say I'd bet these devices are listening to what we're saying," said Danielle, who did not want us to use her last name.

Every room in her family home was wired with the Amazon devices to control her home's heat, lights and security system.

But Danielle said two weeks ago their love for Alexa changed with an alarming phone call. "The person on the other line said, 'unplug your Alexa devices right now,'" she said. "'You're being hacked.'"

That person was one of her husband's employees, calling from Seattle.

To read the rest of the story, including video and a response from Amazon, click here.

 

Apple offering one free month of upgraded iCloud Storage Plans

“In a move designed to drive iCloud storage subscription upgrades, Apple is now promoting free month-long trials of 50GB, 200GB and 2TB plans to customers currently on the gratis 5GB tier,” AppleInsider reports.

“Apple is advertising free one month trials of its premium iCloud storage plans to Apple device owners not currently paying for a subscription and who have reached their 5GB limit,” AppleInsider reports. “When these users attempt to perform an iOS device backup, a pop-up message appears promoting the step-up 50GB plan. A similar notification without mention of the free trial has long been part of iOS. [The new message reads], ‘You do not have enough space in iCloud to back up your iPhone. A 50 GB plan gives you plenty of space to continue backing up your iPhone. Your first month is free and it’s just $0.99 each month after.'”

AppleInsider reports, “The free-to-try options apply to each of Apple’s upgrade tiers, ranging from the 50GB rung for $0.99 per month to the 2TB tier for $9.99 per month.”

Read more in the full article here.

Alexa Eavesdropping Flub Re-Sparks Voice Assistant Privacy Debate

After an Alexa-enabled Echo device recorded and shared a private conversation of its unknowing owners, the tech industry – and the public – is casting a wary eye on voice assistant privacy issues.

On Thursday, news emerged that a Portland family’s Echo device had recorded a conversation of them – without them knowing – and then sent an audio file to one of their contacts.

The impacted couple, whose last name was not reported and who said the incident occurred two weeks ago, told news station KIRO 7 that they realized they were being recorded when the contact who received the file called them to say she received an uncanny voice recording. The couple then called Amazon and notified the tech company about the incident.

Amazon has confirmed the error and offered an explanation of what happened in an emailed statement to Threatpost:

“Echo woke up due to a word in background conversation sounding like “Alexa.” “Then, the subsequent conversation was heard as a “send message” request. At which point, Alexa said out loud “To whom?” At which point, the background conversation was interpreted as a name in the customers contact list. Alexa then asked out loud, “[contact name], right?” Alexa then interpreted background conversation as “right.”

Similar to many others with Alexa-controlled home assistants, the Portland family’s home was wired with Internet of Things-connected Amazon devices to control the house’s heat, lights and security system. The family said that they disconnected everything after the incident.

Many in the tech industry see the incident as yet another example of just how easy it is for Alexa – and other voice assistants – to expose consumers’ private conversations and lives within their homes.

“It is not clear if this was simply a software flaw or a malicious attack, but it is a stark wake-up call nonetheless,” Andreas Kuehlmann, senior vice president and general manager at Synopsys said, in an email. “The reports that a popular voice assistant unexpectedly recorded a personal conversation and leaked information to a third party should be a reminder of the potential security and privacy risks of our… always-connected world.”

Amazon has been under heightened scrutiny before when it comes to privacy issues: In May, a team of researchers found that it is possible to closely mimic legitimate voice commands in order to carry out suspicious actions. In April, Checkmarx researchers launched a malicious proof-of-concept Amazon Echo Skill to show how attackers can abuse the Alexa virtual assistant to eavesdrop on consumers with smart devices and automatically transcribe every word said.

But this month’s incident shows that even if a team of researchers aren’t actively looking for vulnerabilities, glitches still exist within smart voice assistants that can potentially lead to a breach of privacy.

“Security and privacy continues to be an issue for these new connected devices… with hackers looking to target these new devices, this is a reminder of the privacy risks that exist for users, at home and at work,”  Nadir Izrael, CTO of Armis, said in an emailed comment.

Privacy issues aren’t just limited to Alexa. Last year, researchers devised a proof of concept that gives potentially harmful instructions to popular voice assistants like Siri, Google, Cortana, and Alexa using ultrasonic frequencies instead of voice commands.

Amazon said in the statement that “as unlikely as this string of events is, we are evaluating options to make this case even less likely.”

Apple wins patent case against Samsung for $539 Million

“Samsung Electronics Co. took a gamble when it appealed a finding it infringed Apple Inc.’s smartphone design patents, and a friendly subsequent ruling from the U.S.’s highest court made it seem like the bet would pay off,” Joel Rosenblatt reports for Bloomberg. “Instead, Apple won an additional $140 million.”

“Seven years after the start of a global patent battle, a jury in a lower court in San Jose, California, delivered a verdict Thursday heavily favoring Apple in a trial that could reshape how companies view the value of patents that protect the shape and design of products,” Rosenblatt reports. “Samsung had appealed the case, and won a 2016 Supreme Court ruling giving it a chance to pare back an earlier award. After that ruling, the basic question for the jury was: Should Samsung have to pay damages based on sales of smartphones in their entirety, or just their components that infringed the iPhone maker’s patents?”

“‘As the saying goes, be careful what you ask for,’ Neel Chatterjee, an intellectual property litigator in Silicon Valley, said of Samsung’s appeal. ‘The jury saw substantial value tied to the design elements of the iPhone, and actually awarded more than Apple previously won,'” Rosenblatt reports. “Now Samsung has to pay $539 million, an increase of $140 million. That makes it a ‘huge loss’ for Samsung, said Michael Risch, a law professor at Villanova University School of Law in Pennsylvania, “and shows the risk it took by continuing to fight.””

“While the verdict isn’t significant for either company’s bottom line, Apple has long maintained there’s a bigger principle at stake. After the 2012 jury sided with Apple, Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook said the lawsuit was about values, and that the company “chose legal action very reluctantly and only after repeatedly asking Samsung to stop copying” its work,” Rosenblatt reports. “Apple said in a statement after the verdict that the case “has always been about more than money.”

Read more in the full article here.

You may have Missed:

Verified by MonsterInsights